How should weapons be described in a standard broadcast?

When describing weapons in a standard broadcast, it is essential to prioritize the communication of potentially dangerous information to ensure public safety and effective response by law enforcement. By mentioning the details about weapons last, it allows for the initial communication of critical information, such as the location, circumstances, or the suspect's behavior, which can help responders quickly assess the situation without causing unnecessary alarm or distraction in the initial moments of the broadcast.

This approach also helps to maintain a structured and coherent narrative, ensuring that responders and the public receive a clear understanding of the situation while understanding that a weapon may or may not pose an immediate threat.

In contrast, describing weapons first could inadvertently cause panic or overshadow other vital information. Mentioning weapons only if they are visible or relevant might lead to a lack of consistency in broadcasts, particularly in situations where a weapon could be hidden or not immediately apparent but still poses a threat.